Comments on: Nissan Introduces Self-Healing Scratch Guard Coat Paint

By: ZX

ZX — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:37:06 +0000

its not that they don’t read.. perhaps they don’t understand? LOL

By: Commentor

Commentor — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 02:26:50 +0000

“f you re-read the article it tells you that the picture was photoshopped to simiulate what the paint does.”

Its funny how many people DONT read the article and go straight to the bsing, thanks for telling the kids who are ADD.

By: Coleman

Coleman — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:39:24 +0000

regardless if it was photoshopped or not.. Audi had this technology about 15 years ago!! remember that pearlescent white that was hip in the 90’s with all the Audi’s… well, it had the same properties.. if it was scratched, a lower layer which was still fluid would slowly fill the scratch.. so what “new” feature is nissan shilling?

Coleman/

By: why do you name call just because it's the in internet ?

why do you name call just because it's the in internet ? — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:27:26 +0000

Either it’s just a virtual example or they’re using Photo Shop to bring out the scratches to make it look like this new paint does more than it should. Something called advertising folks.

Although I must say that the article isn’t half as specific as it should be and I don’t consider “photoshop-ically” to be a word. Not so much.

By: rofl monster is a dumbass

rofl monster is a dumbass — Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:51:30 +0000

it says photoshopically repaired itself dumbass. the author was trying to say that it repaired itself similar to a photoshop job.

Retard, maybe make it past 7th grade then start posting shit.

By: rofl monster

rofl monster — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:43:15 +0000

IT SAYS IT WAS PHOTOSHOPED YA IDIOTS. SOMEONE SAID THAT A WHILE AGO BUT YOU TO THINK TO ACTUALLY READ THE ARTICLE. RETARDS

By: Shane

Shane — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:21:15 +0000

Maybe it was photoshopped. For a kick-off the scratch doesn’t really look like a real scratch. The direction of it makes it look to me as though some photo-shopper has just ran a paintbrush over the picture a few times and faded it out.
Secondly: think of the last time you saw an advert for some stain removing product. Would the people who make these ads stain their subjects first? Not likely. It’s all a part of the advertising. Just to show you what it will look like when it actually has been used. Most of the times I see something like this it is for Vanish or something like it. The clothes they use look the same for the whole ad. Down to the creases and wrinkles left in them. Another way to show that advertisers do this is to go and look at most DIY hair dyes. Look closely and you will see that the hair is always the same. This would suggest it hadn’t been washed or anything. Only explanation: a bit of photoshopping.

By: Andy

Andy — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:19:58 +0000

actually i hav reasons to think it was photoshopped.

note the scenery below the sunglare.

if you bring up the two photos and contantly swith between another you will notice everything is exactly the SAME including the scenery from below the sunglare(clouds n shit).

chance of exact same place where clouds r put are virtually impossible.

so in my opinion i think this is photoshopped.

but it duz not mean it doesnt work, like mentioned before if could be a virtual interpretation on wot the paint can do.

i have made my point.

By: Random Idiot

Random Idiot — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:42:49 +0000

I got a bridge to sell you.

By: If you disagree with me your an idiot

If you disagree with me your an idiot — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:55:59 +0000

Um, hey guys…

The sun is a constant. If there is two clear days in a row, it will be the same effect, it will look identical.

Furthermore…
Considering Nissan has to prove itself, this isn’t far off. If it looked like it was in a studio, people would go even more easily to the photoshop idea.

It does not say it was photoshopped, it says it has the effect, meaning that is how well it works.

Why in the world, do you think Nissan would lie about this.

Now I could be wrong, but none of u guys sound like u have any experience in photography, let alone car photography. Take some shots of yourself witha brand new car, you will see “photoshopped” sun glares abound. Also the basic marketting principals are also getting past you(the whole need for the photo’s before and after to have a duplicate setup). Minimize distractions from the point. It’s simple.

Also, google something before you make such horribly idiotic statements because you yourself have a warez version of photoshop.

http://www.google.com/search?q=nissan+self+healing+paint&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

F*cking idiots.