Researchers have finally found a way to create storage devices that are capable of storing millions of gigabytes of data.研究人员终于找到了一种方法，创建存储设备是存储容量以百万计的千兆字节的数据。 With the use of与使用 ferroelectric铁电 , the researchers from Drexel University and University of Pennsylvania are able to squeeze 12.8 million gigabytes of information into a cubic centimeter .中，研究人员从drexel大学和宾夕法尼亚大学能挤进12800000千兆字节的信息成为一个立方厘米 。 Very amazing indeed.的确很惊人。
Until recently, researchers were not able to find a method of stabilizing ferroelectricity on the nano-scale.直到最近，研究人员未能找到一种稳定的铁电对纳米级。 It was this group of talented researchers that found out that water is in fact the answer to their problem.这是这个小组的人才，研究人员发现指出， 水实际上是在回答他们的问题。 It has to do with the hydroxyl (OH) ions molecules found in water, which are capable of screening the charges.它必须做的与羟基（哦）离子的分子，发现在水，其中有能力筛选收费。
Imagine the possibility of million-gigabyte hard drives.想象的可能性万GB的硬盘驱动器。 The amount of disk space might seem excessively generous, but I trust that when these drives become a reality, applications that truly leverage the obscene amount of space will start to sprout.磁盘空间量似乎过分慷慨，但我相信，当这些驱动器成为现实，应用，真正利用色情的空间量将开始萌芽。
However, several researchers have suggested that significant challenges still lie ahead, such as methods of assembling the nanowires densely and efficiently reading and writing data to and from the nanowires.然而，一些研究人员曾建议，重大的挑战前面仍然有，如方法组装纳米线的密集和有效率地阅读和写作的数据和从纳米线。
RAID Data Recovery RAID数据恢复 - proprietary software and hardware solution to recover data even from storage devices with mechanical hard drive failure or physical damage. -专有软件和硬件的解决办法来恢复数据，甚至从存储设备与机械硬盘驱动器故障或身体的损害。
May 11th, 2006 at 11:49 pm 2006年5月11日在下午11时49分
Great Idea How Much ?伟大构想多少？ And U think Ebay Would Have it Lol和美国认为，易趣将它lol
May 12th, 2006 at 7:26 pm 2006年5月12日在下午7点26分
I think it would be more than a million gigabyte hard drive, I am not sure how much storage space there is in a hard drive but it is considerably more than a square centimeter.我认为这将是100多万G的硬盘来说，我不知道有多大的存储空间是在一个硬盘驱动器，但它是相当多平方厘米。
Just think in a few years time a hard drive in an iPod could have about 50 petabytes of space (51200 terabytes).试想想，在未来几年时间，硬盘驱动器在一个iPod可以有大约50 PB的空间（ 51200千兆字节） 。 Saying that an MP3 is 5 megabytes you could store about 11 billion songs on it.说，一个MP3是5兆字节，可以存储大约110亿首歌曲。 I think iTunes needs to start socking up我认为iTunes的需要，开始了socking
May 13th, 2006 at 1:26 am 2006年5月13日在上午01时26分
[Comment ID #2508 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2508年将在这里引述]
Or perhaps people will move on to lossless formats.或人们也许会提出，以无损格式。 Hell, if I could store a song at 1 Gig a piece, that’sa million songs on one player at near-perfect quality.地狱，如果我能存储一首歌在一演出一块， that'sa百多万首歌曲，对一名球员在近乎完美的质量。
May 13th, 2006 at 6:02 am 2006年5月13日在上午06时02分
I’m with Bogus,我与假，
Can you believe people (like Matt) would rather get excited by the thought of 11 billion songs on one player in shitty 128kb MP3 format!!!你能相信的人（如马特） ，而宁愿得到激发思想的110.00亿首歌曲，一名球员在shitty 128 KB MP3格式！
I can’t believe people aren’t already crying out for a wider acceptance of lossless formats.我不能相信的人是不是已经哭了一个更广泛的接受无损格式。 This would at least take us back to a sound quality that was introduced at the time of the CD!!这将至少我们回到一个健全的质量，这是介绍的时候，裁谈会！
Mobility has always won out over quality (remember the cassete tape based walkman?)流动性一直赢得了超过质量（记得cassete磁带为基础的随身听呢？ ）
May 13th, 2006 at 6:55 am 2006年5月13日在上午06时55分
I am not just taken by the thought of 11 billion songs, for a start I would not be able to listen to them all.我不是刚才所采取的思想110.00亿首歌曲，一开始我不能够听取他们的一切。 I am trying to put it into context for myself because that is a ridiculous amount of data.我试图把它变成背景下为自己，因为这是一个荒谬的数据量。
I am also thinking that the HD revolution will be very short lived, with that kind of storage HD will look 100×100 JPEG at a very low quolity setting.我还以为房署革命将在很短的生活，与种存储，房屋署会看100 × 100的JPEG在一个非常低的quolity设置。
May 13th, 2006 at 7:54 am 2006年5月13日在上午07时54分
I’m not entirely sure HD will be short lived either.我并不完全肯定，房署将是短暂的生活。
Hard drive capacity has been climbing rapidly but the future of hard disc based media content is restricted by bandwidth.硬盘容量已迅速攀升，但未来的努力光盘基于媒体内容是限制带宽。
Broadband speeds are climbing but what about the cost of services fast enough to give us enough bandwidth to utilise media of greater quality than HD?宽带速度是攀登，但有关服务的费用不够快，给我们足够的带宽，利用媒体更大的质量比HD呢？
I think it’s an exciting time to be alive and I hope enough of the public is able to support new streaming technology, this is when demand will bring these ideas to life!我觉得这是一个令人振奋的时间来还活着，我希望有足够的公众是能够支持新的流媒体技术，这是当需求会带来这些想法的生命！
May 13th, 2006 at 10:42 am 2006年5月13日在上午10时42分
Anyone see the show about how Star Trek changed the technological world of today?任何人看到显示有关如何星舰奇航记，改变了科技今天的世界？ In there they said that teleportation (”Beam me up, Scottie”) would require an obscene amount of data (something about lining up 100gig hard drives back to back halfway to the sun, per person).在那里，他们说，隐形传输（ “束我，斯科蒂” ）将需要1色情的数据量（一些排队100gig硬盘驱动器背靠背的一半，太阳，每人） 。 Something like this would definitely make the task a lot easier.这样，肯定会作出的任务容易得多。 Hell!地狱！ Soon we might be teleporting to the supermarket!不久我们可能会传送到超市！ Definitely a good way to solve the gas crisis.绝对是一个好办法，以解决天然气危机。
May 13th, 2006 at 2:39 pm 2006年5月13日在下午2时39分
They said cubic centimetre people, not square, very significant difference there.他们说立方米厘米的人民，而不是广场，非常显着性差异。
Nevertheless, still can’t wait!尽管如此，仍然不能等待！
Dr.G dr.g
May 13th, 2006 at 5:26 pm 2006年5月13日在下午5时26分
Actually,实际上，
“the researchers from Drexel University and University of Pennsylvania are able to squeeze 12.8 million gigabytes of information into a cubic centimeter. “研究者从drexel大学和宾夕法尼亚大学能挤进12800000千兆字节的信息成为一个立方厘米。 Very amazing indeed.”的确非常了不起的“ 。
They did say cubic centimeter!!!他们说立方厘米！
Read closer.阅读密切。
May 14th, 2006 at 12:42 am 2006年5月14日在上午12时42分
so we’re talking terabyte harddrives….因此，我们正讨论TB的硬盘… 。 why didnt they just say that lol?为什么didn't ，他们只说lol ？
May 14th, 2006 at 12:44 am 2006年5月14日在上午12时44分
Well what sounds more impressive, “One Terrabyte” or “One Million Gigabytes!” ?以及有什么声音，更令人印象深刻， “一terrabyte ”或“百万千兆字节！ ” ？
May 14th, 2006 at 1:29 am 2006年5月14日在上午01时29分
Um, TeraByte is 1,000 GB嗯， TB的是1000 GB的
PetaByte as was mentioned is One Million 1,000,000 Gigabytes PB的作为被提及的是， 1000000 1000000千兆字节
May 14th, 2006 at 3:14 am 2006年5月14日在上午03时14分
I am sorry to say but this is very unimpressive.我很抱歉地说，但，这是非常unimpressive 。 Bell-Labs accomplished this back in 94(may have been 92) and their square centimetter held 12tera bytes.贝尔实验室完成了，这回在94 （可能已被92号）和他们的centimetter广场举行12tera字节。 They had gotten the idea from Star Trek btw, it uses electricity to form and manipulate trillions of microscopic synthetic crystals to resemble binary data.他们的想法得到了来自星际迷航的BTW ，它使用电力的形式和操纵万亿显微人工晶体类似于二进制数据。
May 14th, 2006 at 5:10 am 2006年5月14日在上午05时10分
[Comment ID #2533 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2533年将在这里引述]
Yeah, but where is it on the marketplace?是啊，但如果是对市场的呢？ It probably didn’t show up because it wasn’ta comercially feasible technology.它可能没有显示出来，因为它不是comercially可行的技术。 Maybe this will be.也许这将是。
May 14th, 2006 at 5:50 am 2006年5月14日在上午05时50分
@Matt: @马特：
How can HD be short-lived if most 35mm film hardly outperforms its 2 MP-resolution, especially when the smaller area used, compared to the same format in a still camera, plus the process of analog copying is taken into account?又如何能房署被短命的，如果大多数35毫米胶片难以优于第2的MP -号决议，特别是当规模较小的使用面积相比，相同的格式，在一个仍然摄像头，再加上过程的模拟复制是指顾及？
For a real jump above this resolution, like the Japanese 33 MP UHD-Standard (7.6k-resolution or 4x HD), special, bulky cameras (at least 70mm) are needed, and these can bring up problems with their narrow depth of field: DOF decreases as film/sensor area increases, and stopping down the lens only yields a linear gain in DOF, while it causes an exponential loss of light.为一个真正的跳转上述这项决议，像日本33国会议员uhd标准（ 7.6k分辨率或4倍，房屋署） ，特殊的，笨重的相机（至少70毫米）是必要的，这些可以带出的问题与自己狭隘的景深：自由度跌幅作为电影/传感器的面积增加，停车下来，镜头只有产量的线性增益，在自由度，而它的成因指数损失轻。 But if you shoot at 3200 ISO, there won’t be much of that great resolution left, and unlike a still photographer, you’ll be limited to no more than 1/24s exposure.但是，如果你拍在3200国际标准化组织，将不会有太大的这个伟大的决议左，不像仍然摄影师，您将只限于不超过1/24s曝光。
There are physical limits to what is achievable in filming.有物理极限到什么是可以做到的，在拍摄。
May 14th, 2006 at 10:45 am 2006年5月14日上午10时45分
[Comment ID #2526 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2526年将在这里引述]
My guess is that they wanted it to sound even more impressive….我的猜测是，他们希望它健全的，更令人印象深刻的… … 。 as if it wasn’t impressive enough.至于如果不是令人印象深刻的不够的。
May 14th, 2006 at 9:40 pm 2006年5月14日在下午9点40分
[Comment ID #2533 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2533年将在这里引述]
12 Tera bytes. 12 万亿字节。
This article is talking about 12 Peta bytes, they win, it is 1,000 times as much这篇文章谈到塔 12字节，他们会赢，这是1000倍之多
[Comment ID #2542 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2542年将在这里引述]
Once again, they would have said they were talking about Petabyte hard drives, that is more impressive.再次，他们会说，他们谈到PB的硬盘驱动器，这是更深刻的印象。
12,800 Terabytes to be precise. 12800 TB的要精确。
Read this table to see the prefixes, note what Giga, Tera and Peta equal阅读此表，看看前缀，请注意什么千兆，万亿次和塔平等
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/si_prefix
May 15th, 2006 at 2:30 am 2006年5月15日凌晨2时30分
Wonder how many years, or even decades we’ll have to wait until they create a working prototype.不知有多少年，甚至几十年，我们将要等到他们创造了一个工作原型。
Imagine formatting that sized drive - or even the drive becoming corrupt/damaged.试想格式大中型驱动器-或什至驱动器成为腐败/损坏。 Petabytes of data vanished in an instant. PB的数据消失在瞬间。
I hope it doesn’t take too long, i’m always running out of space even with 450 gigs of hard drive space.我希望它没有考虑太久，我一直失控的空间，甚至与450的演出场合使用的硬盘空间。
May 15th, 2006 at 2:42 am 2006年5月15日在上午02时42分
more offcial info here:更多offcial信息在这里：
http://www.drexel.edu/dateline/default_nik.pl?p=releaseview&of=1&f=20060508-01
May 15th, 2006 at 6:49 am 2006年5月15日在上午06时49分
so exa is the next one up… but i dont think that hard drive would be that big.因此， exa是明年一起来…但我不要认为硬盘驱动器将大。
May 16th, 2006 at 1:49 pm 2006年5月16日在下午1时49分
[Comment ID #2516 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2516年将在这里引述]
There is a much easier way to fix the gas crisis, they has been the invention of a water powered car, if the big wigs didnt kill the creator, the whole world would be using a water powered car which does 100mpg and can use sea water, rain water and tap water.有一个更容易的解决方法气体危机，他们已经发明了一个水动力的汽车，如果大假发didn't扼杀创作者，整个世界将利用水动力的汽车是否100mpg ，并可以使用海水冲厕，雨水和自来水。
May 16th, 2006 at 7:50 pm 2006年5月16日在下午7点50分
[Comment ID #2585 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2585年将在这里引述]
Any news links to that talk about this?任何新闻链接到该谈谈这个？ I haven’t heard of any water engine inventor being killed and would like to read more about this.我没有听到任何水引擎的发明人被杀害，并想阅读更多关于此。
May 16th, 2006 at 9:02 pm 2006年5月16日在下午9点02分
Xad, xad ，
I believe Lex is talking about Stanley A Meyer.我相信法是谈论赤柱一迈耶。
Before he mysteriously died(via poison) he created several patents and documentation about what he was able to do.之前，他神秘地死亡（经毒药） ，他创造了多项专利和文件是什么，他能做到。 These included things like explaining the hydrogen fracturing process.这些措施包括东西一样，解释氢压裂过程。
He was even interviewed by a news crew and offered about 1billion by an arab so that it can just sit on a shelf.他甚至采访的新闻人员及提供约10亿由一个阿拉伯，以便它可以坐在一个架子上。
all documentation and vids is on this site所有文件，并vids是关于这个站点 http://www.waterfuelcell.org/index.html it isnt the same site i first read stuff on though.它isn't相同的网站首先，我读的东西，虽然。
Hope that helps ya.希望有助于亚。
A bit off course from the origianl discussion but heh, the nets all about learning, and so is this site!有点小康的过程中从origianl讨论，但港灯，防鲨网的所有关于学习，所以这是网站！
May 16th, 2006 at 9:04 pm 2006年5月16日在下午9点04分
The people saying they want a 1 Gb mp3 are mostly retarded… mostly.人民群众说，他们希望有一个为1 GB的MP3大多是迟钝…大部分。
Do you really want to spend 15 minutes to an hour transferring one album您真的要花费15分钟， 1小时转1张专辑
from your desktop to your stupid trendy ipod you’re probably so proud of?从您的桌面到您的愚蠢时尚的iPod您可能因此而感到自豪？
Most of you claming 128 kilobit mp3 is “lossy” probably couldn’t tell me大部分你钳夹128 kilobit的MP3是“耗”大概不能告诉我
which is a 128 and which is a 192 if I played them both for you right now.这是一个128和这是一个192 ，如果我发挥他们都为您的权利，现在。
And that is a SLIGHT difference in file size.这是一个略有差异，在档案的大小。 Anyone who thinks making an任何人都认为，谁决策1
mp3 1 Gb is a moron. MP3播放1 GB的是一个木伦。
May 16th, 2006 at 9:18 pm 2006年5月16日在下午9点18分
Aye, a 1GB MP3 would be dumb- because by nature MP3 is a lossy format.赞成， 1 GB的MP3播放，将哑巴-因为本质上的MP3是一种有损格式。 Having another format of a larger filesize would make sense, and realistically, by the time we’ve got Petabytes of storage on an iPod sized device, we’ll have machines fast enough to process files that size quickly.另一种格式有一个较大的文件大小会令责任感，切实，由时间，我们已经得到PB的存储对iPod的大中型装置，我们将有机器不够快的过程中的档案大小迅速。
May 16th, 2006 at 11:06 pm 2006年5月16日在下午11时06分
http://lists.apple.com/archives/dvdlist/2001/Apr/msg00231.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/dvdlist/2001/apr/msg00231.html
This will give you a full rundown of sizes.这将让您全面裁减大小。
I would like a 1 yottabyte drive for all my porn and a bandage for my wrist!!!我想一机一yottabyte我所有的色情和绷带为我的手腕！
May 16th, 2006 at 11:14 pm 2006年5月16日在下午11时14分
[Comment ID #2537 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2537年将在这里引述]
Regular 35mm film outperforms up to 11MP!经常使用35毫米胶片优于最多11mp ！ Until 12MP, ther eis a quality difference that shows 35mm film to be better than your average MP camera.直到12mp ，有EIS的质量差异显示， 35毫米胶片，以更好地比一般的国会议员相机。
May 17th, 2006 at 1:43 am 2006年5月17日在上午01时43分
[Comment ID #2526 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2526年将在这里引述]
Actually… a terabyte is 1000 gigabytes… i believe the correct term for 1 million gigabytes is an exabyte….其实… 1 TB的是1000千兆字节…我相信正确的，任期为100.0万GB的是一安百特… … 。
May 17th, 2006 at 2:15 am 2006年5月17日在上午02时15分
@Alex: @徐家：
First, there is no “magic number” over which film outperforms as detail is reduced gradually.首先，是没有“魔术数字” ，其中电影优于作为详细的是逐渐减少。 Yes, you can beat the 16 MPixel Canon 1DS’ resolution with high-res slide film.是的，您可以击败16 mpixel佳能1ds的决议与高解析度投影片的电影。
But we’re not talking about ISO 20 slide film here, we’re talking about 100, 200 or even higher ASA negative film, plus, at least right now, several generations of analog copies.但我们正在谈论的并非国际标准化组织20幻灯片的电影在这里，我们谈论的100 ， 200 ，甚至更高ASA的负片，再加上，至少在现在，经过几代人的模拟的副本。 Also, as I said, the 35mm movie format has a smaller surface than 35mm still photos.此外，正如我刚才所说， 35毫米影片格式有一个较小的表面比三五毫米仍然照片。
Especially at indoor scenes shot with high ASA film, you can easily see the strong noise and reduced detail at 1080i.特别是在室内的场景拍摄高ASA的电影，您可以很容易地看到强烈的噪音和减少详细1080 i的。
You can’t compare movie film to the ~25 MP high-res slides a determined amateur or pro can produce with 35mm still cameras.你不能比较的电影电影向〜 25国会议员高解析度的幻灯片一个有决心的业余或专业可以产生与35毫米相机。 There is a Panavision movie camera lens with a 300x zoom factor, that basically says everything.有一个潘电影摄影机镜头，拥有300x变焦的因素，基本上说的一切。
May 17th, 2006 at 11:56 am 2006年5月17日在上午11时56分
[Comment ID #2601 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2601年将在这里引述]
Actually an Exa byte is One Billion GB ,其实一exa字节是10.0亿GB ，则
PetaByte is one Millon Gigabytes PB的是一个永千兆字节
please read here:请阅读在这里： http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/si_prefix
I keep posting that, nobody pays any attention我不断重复张贴，没有人自付的任何注意
May 17th, 2006 at 2:25 pm 2006年5月17日在下午2时25分
You’re all retarded… stop measuring this shit in decimal numbers.您所有的智障…停止测量这个shit外围在小数点后的数字。 These numbers come in powers of two.这些数字在今后的权力2 。
Bunch of fucking teenagers一群他妈的青少年
May 18th, 2006 at 12:39 am 2006年5月18日在上午12时39分
11 billion songs would take about 67,000 years to play @ 3 mins each. 11000000000歌曲，需时约6.7万年发挥@每3分钟。 Might not need a shuffle option then..可能需要的不是shuffle的选项，然后..
May 18th, 2006 at 1:14 am 2006年5月18日在上午01时14分
[Comment ID #2526 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2526年将在这里引述]
no, one terabyte is 1024 gigabytes.没有， 1 TB的是1024千兆字节。 this would be 1×10^12.4 terabytes这将是1 × 10 ^ 12.4千兆字节
May 18th, 2006 at 2:49 am 2006年5月18日在上午02时49分
You could store the whole internet on that thing.你可以存储整个互联网上的那个东西。
May 18th, 2006 at 1:57 pm 2006年5月18日在下午1时57分
[Comment ID #2512 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2512年将在这里引述]
The sound quality of the CD is substantially lower than the quality at the recording studio (in terms of bit-rate, at least), so I would think we could go better than that!音质裁谈会是大大低于质量在录音室（在条款比特率，至少） ，所以，我觉得我们可以去优于！
– JJ -的J J
May 18th, 2006 at 5:51 pm 2006年5月18日在下午5时51分
ACTUALLY:其实：
A file size of 1′000′000 gigabytes can also be expressed as文件大小1'000'000千兆字节也可以表示为
8589934592000000 bits 8589934592000000位
1073741824000000 bytes 1073741824000000字节
1048576000000 kilobytes (abbreviated as KB or Kb*) 1048576000000千字节（以下简称KB或或* ）
1024000000 megabytes (abbreviated as M or MB) 10.24亿兆字节（以下简称米或MB ）的
1′000′000 gigabytes (abbreviated as G or GB) 1'000'000千兆字节（以下简称克或GB ）的
976.562500 terabytes TB的976.562500
0.9536743 petabytes 0.9536743容量
0.00093132 exabytes 0.00093132 exabytes
so just to set the record straight.所以刚才设置纪录。
http://www.t1shopper.com/tools/calculate/
May 19th, 2006 at 12:54 am 2006年5月19日在上午12时54分
you know what i find amazing.你知道什么，我觉得了不起。 if someone could actually do this then virtually evrything can be made out of potential data.如果有人真的可以这样做，然后几乎evrything可以作出了潜在的数据。 you could easily build a completly virtual galaxy.您就可以轻松建立一个completly虚拟的银河。 its the matrix brought to life.其矩阵所带来的生命。 and also how ridiculously expensive is this stuff???以及如何可笑的是，这昂贵的东西？ ？ ？
May 19th, 2006 at 5:54 am 2006年5月19日在上午05时54分
well, i read on the official site that Xad gave us that this technology could also be applied to RAM memory, which would mean that RAM could store all running programs in i’ ts memory, even if you shut down the computer.那么，我读上官方网站指出， xad给了我们这种技术也可以适用到RAM记忆体，这意味着内存可以存储所有正在运行的程序在I ' 6月24日ts记忆体，即使你关闭计算机。 i would also mean that we could get around millions of RAM memory in just one computer… now just get motherboards who can support such a massive amount of RAM memory:P我想也意味着我们可以绕开以百万计的RAM存储器，在短短一台电脑…现在刚刚获得主板谁可以支持这样一个大量的RAM记忆体：对
Greetzzz Maikel Zondag greetzzz maikel zondag
someone who can’t wait有人谁不能等待
May 19th, 2006 at 8:22 am 2006年5月19日在上午8时22分
storing songs in lossless formats is not as rewardable as it seems.储存歌曲在无损格式是不作为rewardable ，因为它似乎。 Our ears cannot physically tell the difference between 128 kbs and higher bit rates.我们的耳朵不能身体告诉之间的差额128 KBS和更高的比特率。 We max out at 128, therefor higher bit rates really is awaste of space.我们的最高列于128 ，因而较高的比特率，实在是awaste空间。
May 19th, 2006 at 9:26 am 2006年5月19日在上午09时26分
[Comment ID #2644 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2644年将在这里引述]
Humans have a listening range of around 20 Hz to 20 kHz.人类有一个听力范围约20 Hz至20 kHz 。 Listening is not measured in the same measurements you measure MP3 quality at lol.听力是没有测量在相同的测量你的MP3质量的措施，在lol 。
As for MP3s at 128kbs - the quality is very different to higher bitrate MP3s - i’m no sound buff, but i listen to enough audio to know this.至于MP3音乐在128kbs -质量是非常不同的更高的比特率M P3音乐-我没有健全的迷，但我听不够的音频知道这一点。 192 and above is my preference. 192及以上是我的偏爱。 It depends on your audio equipment, if you have bad equipment, you aren’t really going to benefit from high quality audio.它取决于您的音频设备，如果你有坏的设备，你是不是真的要得益于高品质音频。 Sometimes when the volume is turned up really loud audio quality differences can be heard very easily.有时，当数量是开启了真正的声音的音频质量的差异可以听到很容易。
And another thing, for those people who like lossless audio (as in CD rips) - you don’t have to create incredibly large MP3’s, you can just use the .flac format which is a lossless audio format.和另一件事，对这些人谁像无损音频（如在裁谈会rips ） -你没有创造令人难以置信的大量的M P3，您也可以只使用。的F LAC格式，这是一个无损音频格式。 Audio usually ends up around 30mb for this format.音频通常两端约30 MB为这种格式。
May 20th, 2006 at 8:13 am 2006年5月20日在上午8时13分
[Comment ID #2594 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2594年将在这里引述]
I’ve read up a little more on Stanley Meyer and it sounds like it was all a hoax which he carried out to get money from investors.我已经阅读了一个多一点就赤柱迈耶和它听起来就像是一个骗局，他进行了获得金钱的投资者。 Apparently he failed to prove that it works in a courtcase after which he was forced to pay all the investors money back.显然他未能证明它在一个courtcase后，他被迫支付所有投资者的钱回。 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/stanley_meyer
May 20th, 2006 at 12:00 pm 2006年5月20日在下午12点
[Comment ID #2659 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2659年将在这里引述]
Cheers Xad.欢呼声中xad 。
I skimmed the pages when i first came apon it a week or so ago. i脱脂的网页当我第一次来到一个多星期前。 I was planning on going back to read it in full when I had time, sounded interesting aswell我当时的规划，打算回读，在充分时，我有时间，吹响了有趣的，以及
wiki, u gotta love it.! Wiki上，美国的宝贝，喜欢它。 ！
May 21st, 2006 at 6:35 am 2006年5月21日在上午06时35分
[Comment ID #2526 Will Be Quoted Here] [评论编号： 2526年将在这里引述]
Not necessary.没有必要的。 That kind of tech probably is possible due to having a multi-dimensional layout.这种高科技，大概是有可能的，由于有一个多维的布局。 There is already a technique for writing data in several layers to the platters for current gen drives.目前已有的技术，写入数据在以下几个层次向盘为目前的根驱动器。
May 23rd, 2006 at 7:47 pm 2006年5月23日在下午7点47分
Drexel, Harvard, Penn have only proven the standard 3 to 5 nm cell drexel ，哈佛大学，宾州只有证明标准3至5纳米细胞
size known by everyone in ferroelctrics can go further to 1 nm.已知的大小，大家在ferroelctrics可以更进一步， 1纳米。
As far as their design for use they have not solved the destructive据其设计使用的，他们没有解决的破坏性
readout problem, pinning, or fatigue.读出的问题，寄托，或疲劳。
For a real application go to为一个真正的应用去
http://colossalstorage.net
May 24th, 2006 at 3:28 am 2006年5月24日在上午03时28分
I have to say one thing, a Terabyte is only 1024GB, so this hard drive is thousands of Terabytes!!我要说的一件事， 1 TB的是，只有1024gb ，因此这个硬盘驱动器是数千TB的！
May 24th, 2006 at 6:26 am 2006年5月24日在上午06时26分
God I dont know if I cant wait for this to happen lol, I want it NOW!上帝i不知道如果我cannot等待这种情况出现， lol ，我想现在！
June 1st, 2006 at 11:09 pm 2006年6月1日在下午11时09分
Can you imagine how long it will take to De-Frag a drive this big?你能想象多久，当局将采取什么德- frag一个驱动器这个大？
hhmmm…is bigger “always” better? hhmmm … …是更大的“永远”更好呢？
June 2nd, 2006 at 4:42 am 2006年6月2日在上午04时42分
I dont see what all the fuss is about….to be exact thier talkin 12.2 Petabytes which in my opinion is a big deal. i不用见什么都大惊小怪约… … 。须确切他们talkin 12.2 PB的在我看来，是一个很大的处理。 working in a field where i see 100 gb hd’s swaped every 30 mins because it’s full of data, i know that smaller sized hd’s will always be used due to the chances of information being lost, But this open’sa lot of doors for other possibilities….工作在外地，我看到100 GB的房屋署的swaped每隔30分钟，因为它的充分的数据，据我所知，小型房屋署的将永远使用，由于机会的信息被丢失，但这个open'sa很多门，其他的可能性… … 。
June 9th, 2006 at 12:36 am 2006年6月9日在上午12时36分
allright this seems like its too much storage, imagine the time it would take to retrieve something, take a warehouse thats about 60,000 square feet you go in to ask for something and it takes 30 min to find it and mabey an hour to get it, so you take that to the a computer with 60 gb it takes about a second mabey 2 seconds to retrieve something and you multiply it by millions??所有权，这似乎一样，其太多的仓库，想象的时间，将采取以撷取的东西，这就是一个仓库约六点零零万平方英尺你在要求的东西，它需要30分钟找到它和玛贝1小时获得，所以你需要向计算机与60 GB的需时约1秒2秒玛贝撷取的东西，你再乘以它的数百万吗？ it seems like it would take quite along time to get certain things like trying to find one thing in a huge warehouse???好像它会需要相当的时间一直得到某些东西一样，试图找出一件事，在一个巨大的仓库？ ？ ？
June 17th, 2006 at 3:37 pm 2006年6月17日在下午3时37分
What several people said before about 1GB lossless files - and about how long it would take to transfer the data across to you’re ‘trendy ipod’!什么几个人说，前约1 GB的无损文件-大约需时多久，以数据传输给您'时髦的i Pod' ！
Technology always seems to advance so new creations compliment others.技术始终似乎提前，让新的创造优势等。
As Harddrives get bigger, new, faster methods of transferring data are introduced - eg SATA or USB2 over older, slower technologies.为获得更大的硬盘，新的，更快的方法传输数据，介绍了-例如S ATA或u sb2以上的老年人，慢的技术。
so by the time this crazily large hard drive enter the commercial market - mp3’s may have increased to 100kb, computers may be running 20GB RAM, USB