RSS

RIAA Sues Dead Man’s Children, But Later Drops Case

Wed, Aug 16, 2006

MP3 Players

You’re so sued!

The RIAA is at it again, this time suing the children of a dead man! Since the accused is no longer around, RIAA figured it was a good idea to go after the children instead.

3. Plaintiffs do not believe it appropriate to discuss a resolution of the case with the family so close to Mr. Scantlebury’s passing. Plaintiffs therefore request a stay of 60 days to allow the family additional time to grieve.

4. In the event the parties do not reach a resolution with Mr. Scantlebury’s estate or the other family members involved, Plaintiffs anticipate amending the complaint following depositions of members of Mr. Scantlebury’s family.

How despicable! But it didn’t take long for RIAA to face the backlash from the public. The news spread like wild fire, appearing on major news outlets such as Boing Boing, the Inquirer, ZDNet and more. In light of the bad publicity, RIAA has now decided to lift the charges.

An RIAA spokesperson, Jonathan Lamy, told Boing Boing:

Our hearts go out to the Scantleberry family for their loss. We had decided to temporarily suspend the productive settlement discussions we were having with the family. Mr. Scantleberry had admitted that the infringer was his stepson, and we were in the process settling with him shortly before his passing. Out of an abundance of sensitivity, we have elected to drop this particular case.

But Boing Boing’s Cory Doctorow calls it bull:

Where was the “abundance of sensitivity” when the RIAA failed to initially drop its case against the Scantleberry family following the death of the named defendant in the case? Given that this “abundance” only materialized within 24 hours of this story hitting several large news outlets and blogs isn’t it fair to say that the RIAA is demonstrating sensitivity to its public image, and not its sensitivity to the Scantleberry family?

Suing grandmas, 12-year-old girls, wrong people and now dead man’s children, what’s next?


Source: boingboing.net

, , , , , ,

This post was written by:

Leon - who has written 796 posts on hiptechblog.com.


1 Comments For This Post

  1. Danro Says:

    Just another example of the RIAA and how it is fucking music up! In Canada all the musicians are banding together to stop it. Soon we will only be able listen to certain kinds of music and only with the consent of the RIAA. Well fuck’em!

2 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Broken Lights! » Crazy Says:

    [...] Article: RIAA sues a dead man’s children.. (I thought the RIAA couldn’t sink any lower) [...]

  2. whatthegeek.com Says:

    [...] The RIAA is Going to Knock You Down and Take Your Lunch Money! Lawyers are expensive. That’s no secret. It seems the RIAA has finally become aware of that fact. According to this letter (pdf) found via slashdot the RIAA is attempting to convince ISP’s to send letters requesting a $1000 settlement to anyone the good folks at the RIAA deem guilty of piracy. The guilty parties will be directed to p2plawsuits.com (nothing there yet) where they can bust out the credit card and fork over their hard earned money in hopes of avoiding a real court battle. I would be worried, but the RIAA has a long track record of suing nothing but truly guilty people. I am, however, surprised to see them taking these actions after declaring victory on the war against piracy last summer. [...]

Leave a Reply