<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hiptechblog.com &#187; K3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hiptechblog.com/tag/k3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hiptechblog.com</link>
	<description>Keep abreast of the latest tech gadget. Stay hip!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Samsung K3, Putting Up A Fight With iPod Nano</title>
		<link>http://www.hiptechblog.com/2007/01/10/samsung-k3-putting-up-a-fight-with-ipod-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hiptechblog.com/2007/01/10/samsung-k3-putting-up-a-fight-with-ipod-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hiptechblog.com/2007/01/10/samsung-k3-putting-up-a-fight-with-ipod-nano/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to slim candybar MP3 music players, I can&#8217;t help but compare them with the iPod nano. Like Steve Jobs said yesterday in his keynote, iPod has a 63% market share in the music player market, and the iPod nano has been their best-selling player so far.

So how does the Samsung K3 compares? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to slim candybar MP3 music players, I can&#8217;t help but compare them with the iPod nano. Like Steve Jobs said yesterday in his keynote, iPod has a 63% market share in the music player market, and the iPod nano has been their best-selling player so far.</p>
<div style="float:right;margin-left:10px;"><img src="http://www.hiptechblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/samsung-k3-mp3_01.jpg" width="200" height="425" title="Samsung K3 Music MP3 Player" alt="Samsung K3 Music MP3 Player" class="noborder" /></div>
<p>So how does the Samsung K3 compares? Let&#8217;s take a look, Samsung K3 vs. iPod nano:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Thickness</em>: <strong>0.27-inch</strong> vs. 0.26-inch</li>
<li><em>Display</em>: <strong>1.8-inch color OLED touchscreen</strong> vs. 1.5-inch LCD with blue-white backlight</li>
<li><em>FM-tuner</em>: <strong>Yes</strong> vs. No</li>
<li><em>Music Formats</em>: <strong>MP3, WMA, and PlaysForSure</strong> vs. AAC, MP3, Audible, Apple Lossless, AIFF, and WAV</li>
<li><em>Photo Formats</em>: <strong>JPEG</strong> vs. JPEG, BMP, GIF, TIFF, PSD (Mac only), and PNG</li>
<li><em>Storage Capacity</em>: <strong>2GB, 4GB, and 8GB</strong> vs. Same</li>
<li><em>Colors</em>: <strong>Black</strong> vs. Green, Silver, Black, Pink, and Blue</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can now see, they are pretty different MP3 players that will appeal to different crowds. If you want the slimmest MP3 player with FM-tuner support, look no further than the Samsung K3.</p>
<p>Availability: March 2007, price unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hiptechblog.com/2007/01/10/samsung-k3-putting-up-a-fight-with-ipod-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

